State Attorneys General's Use of Concurrent Public Enforcement Authority in Federal Consumer Protection Laws
نویسنده
چکیده
Recent scholarly and legislative interest in state enforcement of federal law has led to the need for an empirical understanding of how and when these enforcement powers are used. This Article reports on an examination of the use by state attorneys general of sixteen federal consumer protection laws that expressly allow for state enforcement. The data are sorted and analyzed by both single state actions and multistate actions over time, and by the involvement of federal agencies in the state cases. The data reveal a measured use of such powers by state attorneys general and robust state and federal cooperation in the enforcement of the statutes. This study should be useful for future legislative and scholarly examinations offederalism, enforcement powers, and consumer protection.
منابع مشابه
Application of consumer protection authority in preventing tobacco sales to minors.
In the USA, the enforcement of state sales of tobacco products to minors laws has had only limited impact upon reducing youth access. The application of consumer protection authorities by state attorneys general to alter the sales and promotion practices of tobacco retailers provides a complementary and highly leveraged strategy to increase compliance with tobacco sales to minors laws.
متن کاملThe Economic Impact of Eliminating Preemption of State Consumer Protection Laws
In July 2009, the Obama Administration proposed legislation that would create a Consumer Financial Protection Agency (“CFPA”). Among other items, the proposed legislation would eliminate federal preemption of state consumer protection laws, which would encourage states to reintroduce a scattering of local rules and regulations. Federal rules promulgated by the newly created Consumer Financial P...
متن کاملAdvancing public health obesity policy through state attorneys general.
Obesity in the United States exacts a heavy health and financial toll, requiring new approaches to address this public health crisis. State attorneys general have been underutilized in efforts to formulate and implement food and obesity policy solutions. Their authority lies at the intersection of law and public policy, creating unique opportunities unavailable to other officials and government...
متن کاملA Match Made for Court: Patent Assertion Entities and the Federal Trade Commission
Patent assertion entities (PAE), sometimes colloquially referred to as “patent trolls,” have recently found themselves to be quite the targets for policy-makers. From state attorneys general to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to legislators on both sides of the aisle, patent reforms aimed at deterring abusive PAE activity have been a topic heavily discussed and, in some cases, even enacted. ...
متن کاملAre State Consumer Protection Acts Really Little-ftc Acts?
State Consumer Protection Acts (CPAs) were designed to supplement the Federal Trade Commission’s mission of protecting consumers and are often referred to as “little-FTC Acts.” There is growing concern that enforcement under these acts is not only qualitatively different than FTC enforcement, but may be counterproductive for consumers. This article examines a sample of CPA claims and compares t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016